Attacked again-- 05-- Nature of attack

I'm constantly opening and closing this blog-- depending on what I'm feeling is the level of the threat to my real life personhood in this fiasco. Some have told me that it's minor-- that somone is "pushing my buttons"-- but at other times I sense that the direct dual assault on my systematic blog is deeper than that-- and more serious. It's certain that my subscribers and regular readers are not friends... but monitering agents. The mischaracterization of my angle of approach here is not understood. It's quite bizarre.

The one-two punch came several days ago-- and today I'm reassessing the situation. IT now appears to me that my efforts to recontextualize cryonics as part of a larger philosophical schema have been tentatively successful to the degree that some cryonicists are actually feeling threatened. Their argument is this--

Most people view Larouche as a nut. If I write about Larouche and cryonics on one blog, THEY will associate-- falsely-- nutty larouche with cryonics-- and therefore believe cryonics is nutty. Therefore, I should desist from writing about larouche and cryonics in one blog. That was the argument.

Then a second poster appears to have been writing to this blog and the associated forum... but with a more threatening tone-- including my real world initials with the threat that they would take this to higher levels among cryonicists-- and would see to it that my real world life and name, contacts in business and family are involved. This kind of thing has happened before and that's why I took up the use of a psuedonymn for all future work on the net. My name was falsly associated with some really awful and false stuff after my work on the TW case.

The first attacker claimed that i would be hurting cryonics-- by continuing to talk about cryonics in the context of Larouche's views. His argument offered a false alternative-- either publish larouche ideas in a separate blog or be guilty of hurting cryonics. My argument however-- my entire schema-- is that cryonics cannot survive without Classical Humanist ideas espoused by Larouche, like Bretton Woods, megaengineering projects, and regard for the General Welfare. My entire case for cryonics rests upon the Classical Humanist idea of classical immortality. Classical immortality is the basis for physical immortality.

The first attacker said he didn't care about the "logic" of Larouche-- in other words-- it doesn't matter what the truth is-- what matters to the first attacker is that OTHER people consider larouche a nut-- and that therefore I should not associate cryonics with Larouche-- because the ignorant people out there will potentially get the wrong idea-- and that would hurt cryonics. And then he asked if I was interested in the common good of cryonics. Well of course I am-- and my entire point is that if HE was concerned about the common good of cryonics that HE should be interested in teh common good of americans-- in effect, the larouche interpretation of the Constitutiion.

My entire point is that cryoncs can't survive in a Globalist world where pre-emptive wars are allowed by Congress and where manufacturing is allowed to run to the countries with the least amount of labour laws and lowest wages. It's ALL tied together... so the first attacker REFUESED to discuss the possible "logic" or "truth" of what I'm representing here-- ONLY concerned with PRECIEVED wrong headed notions of what OTHER people MIGHT think about Larouche. well, I'm here to say Larouche as been slandered and maligned and he rrepresents the TRUE history of the USA-- in which-- cryonics WILL succeed. That's my entire point. To attack my ability to discuss THAT is to basically ATTACK my right to even thinking and writing about an idea-- for fear that ignorant people won't understand. Well-- what if i write to be BETTER understood? My attacker already say he doesn't CARE about the logic or the truth-- so right there is the "set up"-- THEN came the threat-- that if I continue-- that my name will be used and that therefore my business and personal life is at risk,. This comes from bona fide cryonicists.

Now so far, i've opened and closed this forum so many times, my own head is spinning. They never prepared me for this in university-- direct assaults on my ability to discuss ideas-- no matter how potentially truthful-- but only in an opportunisiic and practical manner taking into account that ignorantn and unread people will misunderstand--

So now today-- I feel that I had to open up again and say that. Maybe like last night-- again tonight-- I'll become afraid of retribution againg-- and race home to close this up again. My new vision-- stimlulated by this-- is to frame cryonics in what I call Classical SuperHumanism. if my attackers attack Classical SuperHumanism-- they'll have to deal with the points I make rather than my freedom of speech to actually make those points-- and cryonics will be part of THAT bigger picture. How can they claim that Classical SuperHumanists like me are not allowed to discuss cryonics? They can't. They don't "own" cryonics-- as a concept-- and in my truthful view of the universe, cryonics can only succeed within a frame of Classical SuperHumanism. I'm signed up for cryonics and I want cryonics to succeed. I intend to convince ignorant readers that looking at Larouche is NOT a bad thing at all-- it's actually extermely useful and interesting-- much DEEPER than antyhing so called "trans humanists" have ever offered. That's the POINT of creating a blog-- to make a point.

For my attackers to attack my integrity based on what they fear ignorant people might mistakently think, despite my arguments being presented expressly for convincing them of another angle-- is a kind of attack that directly reflects the anti-intellecutal mindset of those atatckers... and their threats prove that they're ont interested in the CONTENT of the dbate-- the don't care-- and they also appear to be ready to shut me up-- so if this post stays up and visible for awhile-- maybe some others in cryonics and elsewhere will see it-- and understand cryonics -- and those who appear to be trying to defend their version of cryonics-- actually do. I like cryonics... but I sure don't like a LOT of cryonicists. I don't htink I can name one cryonicist I like anymore. Go figure. What a rotten position for me to be in.

Go ahead and archive this post on your computer. I might be afraid again by the end of today and close this blog for good. I think my morning coffee makes me brave. Fatique makes me fearful.

[+] Debt is not an Asset-- A good Larouche article for cryonicists to read.

[+] Cisco Kid by War

The Cisco Kid was a friend of mine
The Cisco Kid was a friend of mine
He drink whiskey, Poncho drink the wine
He drink whiskey, Poncho drink the wine

We met down on the fort of Rio Grande
We met down on the fort of Rio Grande
Eat the salted peanuts out of can
Eat the salted peanuts out the can

The outlaws had us pinned down at the fort
The outlaws had us pinned down at the fort
Cisco came in blastin', drinkin' port
Cisco came in blastin', drinkin' port

They rode the sunset, horse was made of steel
They rode the sunset, horse was made of steel
Chased a gringo last night through a field
Chased a gringo last night through a field

The Cisco Kid was a friend of mine
The Cisco Kid he was a friend of mine
The Cisco Kid was a friend of mine
The Cisco Kid was a friend of mine

The Cisco Kid was a friend of mine
The Cisco Kid he was a friend of mine
The Cisco Kid was a friend of mine
The Cisco Kid was a friend of mine

The Cisco Kid he was a friend of mine
The Cisco Kid he was a friend of mine
The Cisco Kid he was a friend of mine