Zawacki makes stunning admission re C81

is it just me or did Zawack make a stunning admission about C81? It's probably just me as usual. He wrote to CF readers that he was a close friend of C81-- that's part of the stunning admission-- and that he personally knows that C81 didn't think it was "worth it" to sign up with SA... well what's stunning to ME about that is THIS---

Zawacki does NOT recount the tale of how HE attempted to CONVINCE "his friend" to sign up for the EXTRA SA SERVICE-- which involved on-death-site-perfusion part 1 asap-- he simply leaves "his friend" at the point of thinking it's "not worth it" DESPITE having LOTS OF FUNDS TO DO IT WITH-- which is OPPOSITE to the IMPRESSION BBest left us with-- in that he negotiated the price DOWN with SA because there was "no standby"-- which is "debatable" because there WAS a LITTLE BIT of standby-- and LOTS of travel-- just LIKE a standby... so the whole analysis of C81's case-- as written up-- doesn't really satisfy me.. yet-- I'll read it AGAIN...

The CRITICAL POINT of cryonics TODAY in 2007-- is the link in the chain of events-- that goes from the legal pronouncement of death-- "I now pronounce you to be dead forever"-- is that what the certified "death appraiser" says?--- upon the heart stopping-- (how long does it have to stop for-- 1 minute?-- to washing out all the blood and replacing it with "organ preservation fluid" PRIMARILY--

And I'm at the point where I detect CI has not even TRIED to service their members-- not even TRIED-- not even LOCALLY-- so they NEED SA's servcie-- SA's service puts them not in a BETTER position to DO cryonics-- it puts them in a position to DO cryonics-- because they have NOT been doing cryonics before-- they've been doing post-mortem freezing-- because by todays standards-- which NOBODY defines because cryos are all LIBERTARIAN FOOLS-- so they don't DEFINE COMMON CAUSE for all cryos-- because to THEM, NOTHING is common cause-- they're all "in-diVIDoool-ists"... seee...

So the question for ANDY ZAWACKI-- who was a FRIEND of C81 is-- What does HE think of SA's service--and did he not THINK that it would be WORTH it and did he TELL his FRIEND c81 that it WOULD be worth it?

[DISCUSS IN THREADED FORUM LINKED HEREK]

SA Inc-- C81-- How would CI have handled it? (1)
SA Inc-- C81-- How would CI have handled it?-- Ben Best answer (1)
SA Inc-- C81-- How would CI have handled it?-- Harris (1)
SA Inc-- C81-- illegit (1)
SA Inc-- c81-- liquid ventilation or hypothermic lung lavage (1)
SA Inc-- C81-- Maxim calls on Bull to comment (1)
SA Inc-- C81-- Maxim's analysis (1)
SA Inc-- C81-- medical surrogate-- was the son a... (1)
SA Inc-- C81-- pull the plug decision may be wrong (1)
SA Inc-- C81-- takin care of business (1)
SA Inc-- C81-- Zawacki knew C81 (1)
SA Inc. 07-10-07-- FPatrol blows Maxim off. (1)
SA Inc. 07-12-07-- Last quarter's commentary on SA. (1)
SA Inc. 07-12-07-- Saul Kent's Failure (1)
SA Inc. 07-14-07-- Cryonics world waits for SA Inc ca