Alcorx-- Stumpx 2003-- Rediculous conversation

[+] Here is an Alcorx page I've just read through-- in more detail than before-- where Alcor is making it's case in the Arizona legistlature that I best recall as the Stump attack of 2003. This is an essential part of ccryonics history now-- but the way people in ccryonics write-- is in a way that never makes reference to the broad multi-faceted history of ccryonics. There's no particular reason for me to look at this today-- I look at it merely randomly-- reminating on Arizona law issues about ccryonics and reflecting on the recent attacks on me for writing about larouche and ccryonics in the same blog. My philosophical position-- and I studied philosophy formally a llittle bit in university-- I've read some Plato-- and have looked into the issues that philosophy concerns itself with-- I know what metaphysics "is"-- etc.-- and spent a lot of time in the "stacks"-- looking through musty old books late into the evening until the campus library closed-- and I'd have to drive home to eat a late supper.... so I look at ccryonics-- and philosophical macroissues and macrocryonics-- the philosophical political economic frame in which ccryonics sits-- and we're supposed to be looking after the interests of the ccryonauts-- well-- isn't the way we do that going to be to make sure the USA survives? Since WHEN did it become taboo to talk about politics seriously? I myself am signed up for ccryonics-- and I can SEE that Arizona law under Gov. Napolitanox would allow corporations to run and tollboth the highways... this is not good for anyone and it's not good for the future of cryonicsx.

Allowing access to a blog without triggering the search engines would require adding an x on the end as a suffix to block the engines from seeing it. alcorx, stumpx, etc. cryonicsx. That might be the better technique.