This "C-81" was in the neighbourhood of the CI lab-- and had NO PREVIOUS ARRANGMENTS with SA-- and yet Ben Best GAVE the case to SA! -- with NO FINANCING in place.
WTF?
The problem for me-- is that this guy C-81 was expecting to be preserved by CI-- and was living locally-- so that that whatever arranegments CI had in place-- he would be subject to THAT.
Instead, there's a great deal of transportation problems cited in the SA report. This is not good. This is a breach of that clients contract in my view. The SON-- the "son"???-- made the arrangement with CI??? How can the son abrogate a CLEAR contract with CI???? There are legal pieces of shit going on here with respect to dead bodies that they're not telling us. Ben Best should not have ceded C-81 to Sa. This is bilge.
That client EVEN VISITED THE MORTICIAN that was under contract. That client WAS EVEN IN THE CI neighbourhood. And yet-- when he went into come-- the SON comes in-- who is NOT EVEN SIGNED UP-- and pushes for SA., WTF is that?
More problems..
Melody Maxim is cited-- not by name-- but by CPlatt as abrogating some implied arrangement to operate that Air Transportable Perfusion kit-- the very kit SHE SAID WAS TOO BIG -- that was NOT a good application of the research on CCR... and that Harris said WAS a good implementation.
So here at the core of the technical situation, we see SA was UNQUALIIFED to operate their own equipment!!! It's halarious if it were not so sad.
No... I'm afraid this thing is full of holes.
And the thing here is that I now believe CPlatt in INCAPABLE of comphrending these points of view. He wrote the report LIKE A REDUCTIONIST pretending that thtere was full disclousure because of all the DATA collected. But reality is MORE THAN DATA.... it's just that a reudctionist can't see that. I think there might be some whole brain thinking problems here-- brainwave therapy is needed.
How bizarre that CPlatt and Aschwin wrote-- I guess they both wrote it-- that because ONE PERSON didn't want to be id'd in the report that the reasoned that they would ID NOBODY.
ALL CRYONICS CASES-- to be understood-- REQUIRE PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS-- because there are obviously rules being followed here that don't satisfy me in terms of what the heck is going on.
OH-- Maxim... le't look-- [+] More soon.
Any bigwheels in cryoncs who don't comment on this latest case--- who CAN write and SHOULD write and do NOT write-- about it-- and at least give their view-- publicly-- is effectively aiding and abetting this cryonics "crime". You can't be a mem ber of CI for example-- and NOT wonder what's going on here-- why was this guy handed over to SA?
ALL CI members should be questioning this.
ESPECIALLY the local ones.
This is crazy. SA just made their entire situation worse.... I can't recalll what functionary gave the go ahead-- but presumably it was Kent. You know-- this entire Kent thing has to be controlled-- because Kent is out of control. This was NOT an SA client, the client had NO previous SA plans-- he was local CI-- I'm just FINISHED with this now.
There's something very very crooked about this.... I'm not commenting anymore. I'm walking away from it. I'll look at the Minesota bridge collapse---
I'm signed up with Alcor, and Alcor REJECTED SA proposals to work together and I hope they keep it that way. ACS-- don't know what to say about that organizaiton-- right now. They apparently have some SA contractual arrangements... not sure how that works... but the CI guy was NOT planning on SA.
In addition to the problems-- we now have KENT-- who is on the BOARD OF ALCOR-- having approved the CI-81 deal-- what a mess.
Even if there ARE no legal problems here-- and even if the ETHICS of it somehow is explained on behalf of C81-- Here's my bottom line....
I don't like it.
Why?
It's too crooked.
It's not straight forward.
I'm walking away from it-- and will stay signed up with Alcor-- but I can't get past the intial handing over of C81 by Best to SA-- when C81 was LOCAL. We cryonicists do NOT KNOW how cryonics works. We're being bamboozled with tech data-- which makes it LOOK LIKE full disclousure-- but the legal, financial and ethical considerations-- remain hidden as alwyas.
As always, FD is leading the direction of thought on CF-- and will "cover" to some extent for SA/CI-- always on the attack on Alcor-- but strangely helpful to SA-- and even supportive.
CryoNet-- VOID as always... silence.
No commentary from cryonics bloggers.
UPDATE 8-6-07
[+] Cold Filter thread-- "Services not contracted for".
No comments:
Post a Comment