Are THer's nothing more than neotanists?

Mplus mentioned neotany in a recent blog post. I'll find it later. It occured to me, as I viewed the online TH Chicago conference material that Th'ers might be nothing MORE than simply neotanists. They get together with other neotanists-- simply because birds of a feather flock together. THers' have nothing to say on 9/11, the USA economy, the reality of the next 50 years. They all seem to me to be childish. Neotanists. Sure-- there are brilliant people among them, but they're not integrating the reailty of the world like Larouche sees it with history, civilization, the future and the actual definition of the universe. Most are still in the infantile stage of their arrested teen development-- so the reality of, say, the isotope economy or the reality of the falling behind of the US nuclear power industry and the world water shortage due to using up fossil water-- is beyond their ken. Most cryos are like that too. The reality of a key Alcor person-- Jones-- at the conference-- rather than manning the emergency cryonics rescue station-- is bizarre in my view. Why would she leave her station for THAT? I agree with FD in CF on this point. Alcor is going to have to open the black box and allow us to witness who the rescue team on call is exactly. Neotany is fine-- as long as adults supervise them. The problem with most cryos and all THer's is that they think their adults. They really don't have an adult view of the world or history. I'm signed up for cryonics and once followed THsm pretty closely but dropped it and then realized how poor a philosophy it was in light of Classical Humanism as defined by Larouche and company.